Are some Natural Predictions present in the board TO BE AVOIDED? Yes! Let’s see how and why in this new guide.
Today a quick guide on Natural Predictions to… avoid!
Good evening from Bet Bunker, I took a break to unwind and to digest the bitter disappointment of Italy. By the end of the week we will fortunately be absorbed again by the championship and our football betting.
By the way, the next Totocalcio contest is not yet visible and so all we have left is a nice betting guide on a topic that I often mention but that I have never explored in depth with a dedicated video.
What does it mean to avoid Natural Predictions from the board? I often say it on Saturday when I do the analysis of the board, it’s not that everything is good and to bet on, just because there are so many Natural Predictions then we must try to identify the best ones.
On how to choose the best Natural Predictions I have already made several videos but on how to avoid them let’s see some ideas today.
To give you an idea, since the beginning of March I have avoided Natural Predictions and suggestions also of coverage odds on 114 cases of which 21 have instead been winning. Is it a lot, is it a little? It is a good number because some aspects must be considered.
These are Natural Predictions, so there can also be 2/3 Natural Predictions in the same match. I don’t know Liverpool who hasn’t drawn and lost in a certain number of days against Leeds who hasn’t won in a certain number of days, if I don’t bet anything on this match they are 3 Natural Predictions that I don’t consider in one “shot”.
Among these there are unplayable Natural Predictions such as PSG waiting for a draw against a poor one where 1X is too low and X2 is excessively risky or a Tottenham that hasn’t won in 5 and 1X or scores goals is too low but I don’t want to risk the fixed 1, also because it is also given at little.
Clearly, therefore, the exclusion of a Natural Prediction is necessarily linked to the odds.
You could also decide to exclude matches for example of Türkiye at 11 in the morning or at 12 because they are still too early.
It is clear that the more you leave out, the more you can get through, so be careful not to go too far in the other direction or you will limit your choices excessively.
Some cases where I never avoid Natural Predictions? And then I put at least a coverage quota.
For example when there are double Natural Predictions on the draw, or when in addition to the series relating to no win, draw or defeat there are also series of even or odd goal sums. Or if there are series of consecutive draws or identical results. Series without particular goals scored or conceded, to name a few.
A good method could be the mental test in reverse: that is, apart from the situations mentioned above, if you categorically exclude a Natural Prediction it could mean that you are convinced that it does the opposite.
And this point anticipates another aspect that I will talk about in another video, that is, Natural Predictions are so organic that they can sometimes also be used for eco-friendly recycling for our bubbles…
A big hello from the Bet Bunker and see you soon,
Stephen
